Re: Bug#745099: openmama: FTBFS with Java 8: class MamdaLock is public, should be declared in a file named MamdaLock.java
Damian Maguire <DMaguire@...>
Cheers for that Emmanuel, and Daniel for forwarding it on. We'll take a look and get this merged into upstream as soon as possible.
From: Daniel Pocock <daniel@...>
Date: Friday, August 8, 2014 2:48 PM
To: "'openmama-dev@...'" <openmama-dev@...>, "745099@..." <745099@...>, Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@...>
Subject: [Openmama-dev] Fwd: Re: Bug#745099: openmama: FTBFS with Java 8: class MamdaLock is public, should be declared in a file named MamdaLock.java
Emmanuel, thanks for this fix, I'm sending it to the OpenMAMA developers for inclusion upstream
-------- Original Message --------
Control: tags -1 patch Here is a patch fixing this issue. Java 8 was simply not recognized as Java 5 or later by the Ant build, this skipped the logic to rename MamdaLock15.java into MamdaLock.java and triggered a compiler error. Emmanuel Bourg
This message may contain confidential information and is intended for specific recipients unless explicitly noted otherwise. If you have reason to believe you are not an intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. This message may not represent the opinion of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE), Euronext or any of their subsidiaries or affiliates, and does not constitute a contract or guarantee. Unencrypted electronic mail is not secure and the recipient of this message is expected to provide safeguards from viruses and pursue alternate means of communication where privacy or a binding message is desired.