Re: fields MdSubscMsgType and MdMsgType in message


Frank Quinn <fquinn.ni@...>
 

Hi Dmitri,

Where are you seeing this message? This will be driven by the data source, but MdSubscMsgType is typically only included in subscription request messages (as suggested in the comment in subscmsgtype.h). I wouldn't expect it to provide any relevant information when sent in an update (in fact it probably shouldn't be included in updates).

Cheers,
Frank

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Dmitri Fedorov <dfedorov.solace@...> wrote:
Hi,

When a message has this field:
 MdSubscMsgType:61

and also it has this field:
 MdMsgType:1

am I right to assume that MdMsgType is the real message type?

In other words, does MdMsgType take precedence over MdSubscMsgType?

Do we have a legal/illegal combinations of MdMsgType and MdSubscMsgType?

Thank you.

Regards,
Dmitri Fedorov
Software Architect
Solace Systems, Inc.
Ottawa, ON Canada

Solace Systems accepts no liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Solace Systems.

_______________________________________________
Openmama-dev mailing list
Openmama-dev@...
https://lists.openmama.org/mailman/listinfo/openmama-dev


Join Openmama-dev@lists.openmama.org to automatically receive all group messages.