Hi, I've been looking at the data quality (dq) code and have some ideas on how to support multiple dq strategies. Generally mama has a dq strategy built into dqstrategy.c, subscription.c, and

Hi Chris, I owe that, I’ll send an updated PDF to the list today/tmrw. OpenMAMA group: is there a place on the wiki to store the PDF? Thanks, Reed. Reed Alpert |Corporate &

Hello, I was wondering where I can find up-to-date documentation for Publisher Events with transport callbacks (like a wiki page)? The current wiki page

Hi, Submitted one pull request for Sconscript.win to create entitlementlibraries.c. With that the build works fine via scons on Windows 7 32b/64b, RHEL5 32b/64b, RHEL6 32b/64b. Thanks,

Hi Folks, We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for OpenMAMA 2.4.0 is now available: https://github.com/OpenMAMA/OpenMAMA/releases/tag/OpenMAMA-2.4.0-rc1 As many of you will be aware,

Great, thank you very much Frank, we're looking forward to it. Regards Dmitri

Hi Dmitri, Yeah most of the work is done at this point so with any luck we’ll be taking the RC cut at the end of this week or the beginning of next week. Cheers, Frank From:

Thank you Frank, No, there is nothing, I'm just trying to understand when we are here at Solace Systems should expect this release. I suppose it will take a few days to complete the remaining issues,

Hi Dmitri, Yeah that’s all that is to be completed before we take the 2.4.0 cut, why is there something that you need squeezed in? Cheers, Frank From: openmama-dev-bounces@...

Hi all, I'm with Solace R&D for OpenMAMA. Am I right to assume that this list of open issues https://github.com/OpenMAMA/OpenMAMA/milestones/OpenMAMA-2.4.0 is all what is remained before 2.4.0 is

For us it is mostly a support issue, in that when working with a bridge vendor it is easier if we are also using their payload. If we are mixing bridges and payloads a vendor can quite reasonably ask

Hi Folks, On the technical committee call today there was unanimous agreement that this is the right course of action for the 2.4.0 release. However, if anyone else from the community has any

Hi Folks, As brought up on a recent thread from Ben: 2)My only observation, which is somewhat related, is that we kept the concept of a default payload. I think this break the whole purpose

Thanks Ben - glad to see you're happy to take the plunge! On point #2, I was actually talking to Damian about this very point yesterday and I think I agree with the sentiment of what you're saying,

Hi Frank, I won't make it to today's call, but wanted to give some feedback : 1)I think it is perfectly OK to break backwards compatibility given: · We are all aware that the API need

Hi Folks, Dynamic Bridge Loading is coming in 2.4.0 and it brings with it a level of flexibility which is new to OpenMAMA’s internal bridges. It effectively allows: 1. OpenMAMA to have

I’ve raised an issue to cover this on github. Here is a link to the issue: https://github.com/OpenMAMA/OpenMAMA/issues/114 Chris Morgan From: Alpert, Reed

I think the app needs to call sub->destroy(), then wait for the onDestroy(), and then ‘delete sub’. onDestroy() is a completion event – once you get it you won’t hear from that

I’ll add a bit of clarification to the problem with the CPP interface if the middleware bridge queues an event to call the onDestroy callback. When an application destructs a MamaSubscription

Hi, I’m with solace dev for the openmama middle bridge and I have question about mamaSubscription onDestroy with the CPP openmama. On the openmama Developer Wiki under Bridge Documentation