|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] Added Inno Setup installer script and LICENSE file
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] Added Inno Setup installer script and LICENSE file
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1891
·
|
|
Re: Should we make the jump to cmake?
- Somehow I managed to drop the mailing list responding to this earlier. Sorry about that.
In an effort to avoid bike-shedding this one, I'll say nothing more than I think using CMake is a great
- Somehow I managed to drop the mailing list responding to this earlier. Sorry about that.
In an effort to avoid bike-shedding this one, I'll say nothing more than I think using CMake is a great
|
By
Damian Maguire <dmaguire@...>
·
#1890
·
|
|
Re: Should we make the jump to cmake?
Hi,
CMake is fine for us, Tick42 uses it now so we have it integrated into our build systems.
Most important is making it easy to change a build feature and do it on one place.
Are there
Hi,
CMake is fine for us, Tick42 uses it now so we have it integrated into our build systems.
Most important is making it easy to change a build feature and do it on one place.
Are there
|
By
Alpert, Reed <reed.alpert@...>
·
#1889
·
|
|
Re: Should we make the jump to cmake?
Hi Glenn
My choice is autotools for Linux and MSBuild (VS-project files) on Windows.
I don't see any advantage of using cmake over autotools and I don't understand why need a cross-platform builds
Hi Glenn
My choice is autotools for Linux and MSBuild (VS-project files) on Windows.
I don't see any advantage of using cmake over autotools and I don't understand why need a cross-platform builds
|
By
Dmitri Fedorov <dfedorov.solace@...>
·
#1888
·
|
|
Re: Should we make the jump to cmake?
Apologies that was supposed to have been sent last Friday (and hopefully you can all see this now).
Apologies that was supposed to have been sent last Friday (and hopefully you can all see this now).
|
By
Frank Quinn <fquinn@...>
·
#1887
·
|
|
Should we make the jump to cmake?
Sending on behalf of Frank (mail issues):
Hi Folks,
I have been giving quite a bit of consideration recently to making life easier for setting up new development environments for 3
Sending on behalf of Frank (mail issues):
Hi Folks,
I have been giving quite a bit of consideration recently to making life easier for setting up new development environments for 3
|
By
Glenn McClements <gmcclements@...>
·
#1886
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] COMMON: Removed wtimegm implementation for Windows
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] COMMON: Removed wtimegm implementation for Windows
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1885
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] COMMON: Removed wtimegm implementation for Windows
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] COMMON: Removed wtimegm implementation for Windows
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1884
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[Frank Quinn] Whitespace tidy up across large numbers of
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[Frank Quinn] Whitespace tidy up across large numbers of
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1883
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[Frank Quinn] Whitespace tidy up across large numbers of
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[Frank Quinn] Whitespace tidy up across large numbers of
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1882
·
|
|
Re: New feature: Extending timestamp format
In the TREP bridge we have a wrapper around the mamaDateTime type and only use the accessor functions. There is a certain amount of messing around converting between mamaDateTime and rssl date and
In the TREP bridge we have a wrapper around the mamaDateTime type and only use the accessor functions. There is a certain amount of messing around converting between mamaDateTime and rssl date and
|
By
Tom Doust
·
#1881
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] EXAMPLE: Added -rewind option to mamaproducerc_v2 (#220) mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] EXAMPLE: Added -rewind option to mamaproducerc_v2 (#220) mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1880
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] EXAMPLE: Added -rewind option to mamaproducerc_v2 (#220) mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[noreply] EXAMPLE: Added -rewind option to mamaproducerc_v2 (#220) mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1879
·
|
|
Re: New feature: Extending timestamp format
For Vela we have a couple of payloads:
- V5/Wirecache has its own internal format and calls mamaDateTime setters, so this is fine.
- WombatMsg actually uses the same encoding as OpenMAMA does
For Vela we have a couple of payloads:
- V5/Wirecache has its own internal format and calls mamaDateTime setters, so this is fine.
- WombatMsg actually uses the same encoding as OpenMAMA does
|
By
Glenn McClements <gmcclements@...>
·
#1878
·
|
|
Re: New feature: Extending timestamp format
I think that, at the moment, the most important payload bridges come from Vela, Solace and Tick 42. Would anyone from Solace and Tick 42 care to comment on the behaviour of their payload bridges and
I think that, at the moment, the most important payload bridges come from Vela, Solace and Tick 42. Would anyone from Solace and Tick 42 care to comment on the behaviour of their payload bridges and
|
By
Phelan, Nigel
·
#1877
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Fixed Vector DateTime Unit Tests (#221) .gitignore mama/c_cpp/src/gunittest/c/payload/payloadvectortests.cpp
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Fixed Vector DateTime Unit Tests (#221) .gitignore mama/c_cpp/src/gunittest/c/payload/payloadvectortests.cpp
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1876
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[Frank Quinn] VERSION: Updating version files to
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[Frank Quinn] VERSION: Updating version files to
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#1875
·
|
|
Re: New feature: Extending timestamp format
It’s definitely a good thing to have, Glenn, but it does add some complexity, particularly when you consider future and past dates, daylight savings transitions and the desire to compare timestamps
It’s definitely a good thing to have, Glenn, but it does add some complexity, particularly when you consider future and past dates, daylight savings transitions and the desire to compare timestamps
|
By
Phelan, Nigel
·
#1874
·
|
|
Re: New feature: Extending timestamp format
Hi Nigel,
Apologies, yes I meant to mention timezones in the original email as something to consider
- Does anyone have any other suggestions for the new format? For example,
Hi Nigel,
Apologies, yes I meant to mention timezones in the original email as something to consider
- Does anyone have any other suggestions for the new format? For example,
|
By
Stuart Beattie
·
#1873
·
|
|
Re: New feature: Extending timestamp format
If contemplating a new type, is it worth considering the question of time zones? The current model doesn’t really address this, although the java constructors have some implicit assumptions that
If contemplating a new type, is it worth considering the question of time zones? The current model doesn’t really address this, although the java constructors have some implicit assumptions that
|
By
Phelan, Nigel
·
#1872
·
|