Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [fquinn.ni] PLAT-773: Extend time range for mamaDateTime structures. C/CPP

Hi Nigel, Yes I just completed editing the RFC details with the updated prototypes and updated status: https://openmama.github.io/openmama_rfc_closed.html Vela also submitted a fresh PR with requested

Looks like the right thing to do, Frank. Do you intend to revise the RFC in some way to take account of this (in case the previously mentioned payload bridge developers refer to that for a reference

Hi Folks, I tried running the recent extended MAMA Date Time unit tests on windows after some of my suggested changes were made (https://github.com/OpenMAMA/OpenMAMA/pull/245) and got some suspicious

Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [noreply] COMMON: Made version string parsing more robust

Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [noreply] COMMON: Made version string parsing more robust

Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [noreply] COMMON: Made version string parsing more robust

Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [noreply] Removed gCachedMsg from mamaproducerc_v2 mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c Results for OpenMAMA_RPM CI

Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [noreply] Removed gCachedMsg from mamaproducerc_v2 mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c Results for

Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch! [noreply] Removed gCachedMsg from mamaproducerc_v2 mama/c_cpp/src/testtools/performance/c/mamaproducerc_v2.c Results for OpenMAMA Next

Thanks Dmitri – we’ll await your test case. FRANK QUINN Principal Engineer - EMEA Vela Trading Technologies O.+44 289 568 0209ext. 3592 fquinn@... Adelaide Exchange Building, 2nd

You trying to delete an order book entry I assume? What sort of undesired MAMDA behaviour? You have a backtrace if a crash results? I can’t see the rest of your book to assess if PL_SIZE=3112200 is

Hi Dmitri, Looks like an illegal message to me – it’s trying to add an entry to a price level with zero size. Cheers, Frank FRANK QUINN Principal Engineer - EMEA Vela Trading

Thanks Damian, Yes, referring to the data dictionary file made them working, my bad, I naively trusted to the "bookticker --help" output :-/. My focus is recap messages and how different order book

From a really (really) quick glance at the source, I don’t think the BookPublisher code is handling dictionary requests itself. You can probably get ‘bookticker’ to work by using the same

Hi all, I'm testing the QPID bridge with bookpublisher and bookticker, but it seems that the dialog between them is stuck at the data dictionary request. This is the command lines: > bookpublisher -v

Thank you Damian, I don't want to bring it up just based on the code analysis. Let's see if I'd be able to come up with a test case that demonstrates different behaviour that is triggered by this

Hi all, Is this a valid MAMDA delete message, please (non-relevant fields

Hi all, Is this a valid MAMDA update message, please (non-relevant fields

Hey Dmitri, There's probably someone who can clarify better, but I believe the difference is the 'mNumEntries' is the total number of entries which the data feed has reported is part of the book, but