|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] PLAT-1189: Reserve fields tidyup (#303) mama/c_cpp/src/c/reservedfields.c[fquinn.ni] [COMMON] Fix potential buffer overflow in
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] PLAT-1189: Reserve fields tidyup (#303) mama/c_cpp/src/c/reservedfields.c[fquinn.ni] [COMMON] Fix potential buffer overflow in
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2059
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Allows MamdaOrderBookWriter to add epoch 0 to book messages.
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Allows MamdaOrderBookWriter to add epoch 0 to book messages.
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2058
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Off-by-one error in endpointpool (#307) mama/c_cpp/src/c/bridge/qpid/endpointpool.c
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Off-by-one error in endpointpool (#307) mama/c_cpp/src/c/bridge/qpid/endpointpool.c
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2057
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Add missing qpid transport property (#308) mama/c_cpp/src/examples/mama.properties
Results for OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Linux CI run
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Add missing qpid transport property (#308) mama/c_cpp/src/examples/mama.properties
Results for OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Linux CI run
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2056
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Add ability to suppress logging of payload load failure. (#306) mama/c_cpp/src/c/mama.c
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Add ability to suppress logging of payload load failure. (#306) mama/c_cpp/src/c/mama.c
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2055
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Add logging of thread names during creation (#305) mama/c_cpp/src/c/queue.c mama/c_cpp/src/c/mama.c
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Add logging of thread names during creation (#305) mama/c_cpp/src/c/queue.c mama/c_cpp/src/c/mama.c
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2054
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [CAPTUREREPLAY] code cleanup and symbol file support
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [CAPTUREREPLAY] code cleanup and symbol file support
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2053
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Fixed crash in MamdaTradeTicker (#296) mama/dotnet/src/cs/MamaMsgField.cs
Results for OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Linux CI run with
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] Fixed crash in MamdaTradeTicker (#296) mama/dotnet/src/cs/MamaMsgField.cs
Results for OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Linux CI run with
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2052
·
|
|
Re: Crash in subscription destroy: error in mamaSubscription_getSubjectContext
Thanks Yury,
Raised https://github.com/OpenMAMA/OpenMAMA/issues/300 so we don't forget to get this sorted.
Cheers,
Frank
Thanks Yury,
Raised https://github.com/OpenMAMA/OpenMAMA/issues/300 so we don't forget to get this sorted.
Cheers,
Frank
|
By
Frank Quinn <fquinn@...>
·
#2051
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Successful)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Add comments to the DQ Publisher Manager headers (#299) mama/c_cpp/src/c/mama/dqpublishermanager.h
Results for
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
[fquinn.ni] [MAMA] Add comments to the DQ Publisher Manager headers (#299) mama/c_cpp/src/c/mama/dqpublishermanager.h
Results for
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2050
·
|
|
Code change(s) just landed on origin/next (Still Failing)
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
No changes
Results for OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Windows CI run with latest changes:
CI Project Name: OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Windows
Build Number:
Some changes have just been added to the origin/next branch!
No changes
Results for OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Windows CI run with latest changes:
CI Project Name: OpenMAMA_Snapshot_Windows
Build Number:
|
By
jenkins@...
·
#2049
·
|
|
Crash in subscription destroy: error in mamaSubscription_getSubjectContext
Classification: Public
Hi guys,
There is a copy-paste error in mamaSubscription_getSubjectContext function that leads to crash on subscription destroy in case if issue symbol differs that the symbol
Classification: Public
Hi guys,
There is a copy-paste error in mamaSubscription_getSubjectContext function that leads to crash on subscription destroy in case if issue symbol differs that the symbol
|
By
Yury Batrakov
·
#2048
·
|
|
Re: [Openmama-users] Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Classification: Public
Hi, Tom.
As Frank suggested, I switched our app from destroy () to destroyEx() (MamaSubscription), but I still get a segmentation fault. I think the reason of segfault is
Classification: Public
Hi, Tom.
As Frank suggested, I switched our app from destroy () to destroyEx() (MamaSubscription), but I still get a segmentation fault. I think the reason of segfault is
|
By
Konstantin Baydarov
·
#2047
·
|
|
Re: [Openmama-users] Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Yes we call back on the bridge’s thread. We don’t queue the message, we leave the client code to do that if it wants to. This is by design.
Yes we call back on the bridge’s thread. We don’t queue the message, we leave the client code to do that if it wants to. This is by design.
|
By
Tom Doust
·
#2046
·
|
|
Re: [Openmama-users] Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Classification: Public
Hi, Tom.
I noticed, that comparing to qpid bridge(that comes with openmama sources), tick42rmds calls mamaSubscription_processMsg() method from separate thread and not
Classification: Public
Hi, Tom.
I noticed, that comparing to qpid bridge(that comes with openmama sources), tick42rmds calls mamaSubscription_processMsg() method from separate thread and not
|
By
Konstantin Baydarov
·
#2044
·
|
|
Re: [Openmama-users] Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Classification: Public
Hi Tom,
We are using version 1.3.
As I see from latest github code the problem still exists. See RMDSBridgeSubscription::OnMessage method:
if (isShutdown_ || ((0 !=
Classification: Public
Hi Tom,
We are using version 1.3.
As I see from latest github code the problem still exists. See RMDSBridgeSubscription::OnMessage method:
if (isShutdown_ || ((0 !=
|
By
Yury Batrakov
·
#2045
·
|
|
Re: [Openmama-users] Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Hi Yury, Konstantin
Are you using the current github version of the bridge code? We looked at and fixed some of the issues around locking the subscription destroy some time back.
It would be good to
Hi Yury, Konstantin
Are you using the current github version of the bridge code? We looked at and fixed some of the issues around locking the subscription destroy some time back.
It would be good to
|
By
Tom Doust
·
#2043
·
|
|
Re: Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Apologies, I misread the part in the first email where it mentions mamaSubscription_destroy from arbitrary threads.
If you're calling mamaSubscription_destroy from a thread which was not the same
Apologies, I misread the part in the first email where it mentions mamaSubscription_destroy from arbitrary threads.
If you're calling mamaSubscription_destroy from a thread which was not the same
|
By
Frank Quinn <fquinn@...>
·
#2042
·
|
|
Re: Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Classification: Public
Hi, guys.
I'm working on the issue with Yury. I spotted the deadlock possibility during debugging tick42rmds bridge crash on unsubscribe, will be interested knowing the
Classification: Public
Hi, guys.
I'm working on the issue with Yury. I spotted the deadlock possibility during debugging tick42rmds bridge crash on unsubscribe, will be interested knowing the
|
By
Konstantin Baydarov
·
#2041
·
|
|
Re: Concurrent subscription.destroy() ? Crash when using tick42rmds transport.
Classification: Public
Hi Frank,
Let me answer your question in random order :)
2. It looks like a designed behavior of RMDS bridge - callbacks are invoked in a thread servicing transport events
Classification: Public
Hi Frank,
Let me answer your question in random order :)
2. It looks like a designed behavior of RMDS bridge - callbacks are invoked in a thread servicing transport events
|
By
Yury Batrakov
·
#2040
·
|