|
Re: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1411
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Alireza,
Yes, it will include the current contents of the next branch.
Thanks,
Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs
Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2
Hi Alireza,
Yes, it will include the current contents of the next branch.
Thanks,
Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs
Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1410
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Gary,
Is the current content of ‘next’ branch what you had in mind for the 2.3.2 release?
Regards,
--Alireza
Hi Gary,
Is the current content of ‘next’ branch what you had in mind for the 2.3.2 release?
Regards,
--Alireza
|
By
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
·
#1409
·
|
|
OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1408
·
|
|
[PATCH 2.3.1 1/1] TESTTOOLS: capturereplayc does not need to send reply when the received mama subscription request is not from inbox.
If subscription message is not from inbox, then there is no need to
publish the initial image when processing onNewRequest or onRequest.
For example, in the case of a real time market data
If subscription message is not from inbox, then there is no need to
publish the initial image when processing onNewRequest or onRequest.
For example, in the case of a real time market data
|
By
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
·
#1407
·
|
|
[PATCH 2.3.1 1/1] MAMAC: Missing actions for snapshot subscriptions transition to deactivate state
For snapshot subscriptions, there is no bridge subscription callback
to be called later with mamaSubscriptionImpl_onSubscriptionDestroyed.
Therefore, add code to perform the additional actions for
For snapshot subscriptions, there is no bridge subscription callback
to be called later with mamaSubscriptionImpl_onSubscriptionDestroyed.
Therefore, add code to perform the additional actions for
|
By
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
·
#1406
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA and Enterprise Mama
Quick addendum ...
If you can't access Google Docs (seems to be banned everywhere), I've
also prepared a "document pack" zip-file with all of the
aforementioned docs. Available at the following URI
Quick addendum ...
If you can't access Google Docs (seems to be banned everywhere), I've
also prepared a "document pack" zip-file with all of the
aforementioned docs. Available at the following URI
|
By
Lee Skillen <lskillen@...>
·
#1405
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA and Enterprise Mama
Hi Reed,
I'm not sure about the current ongoings/plans with OpenMAMA or
EnterpriseMAMA but VFT released a draft for an extensible library
manager earlier this year.
We also have an unreleased draft
Hi Reed,
I'm not sure about the current ongoings/plans with OpenMAMA or
EnterpriseMAMA but VFT released a draft for an extensible library
manager earlier this year.
We also have an unreleased draft
|
By
Lee Skillen <lskillen@...>
·
#1404
·
|
|
OpenMAMA and Enterprise Mama
Hi,
What is the plan for OM and EM?
The entitlements in EM are not available in OM, and it looks like turning on entitlements in mama layer is for all of the loaded bridges.
Are patches to OM
Hi,
What is the plan for OM and EM?
The entitlements in EM are not available in OM, and it looks like turning on entitlements in mama layer is for all of the loaded bridges.
Are patches to OM
|
By
Alpert, Reed <reed.alpert@...>
·
#1403
·
|
|
Re: Error handling in market data subscription activation and error notification to application
Hi Gary,
Thanks a lot for your response on this. Your suggestions sound good.
Please see my comments to your mail inline marked with [AA:].
--Alireza
Hi Gary,
Thanks a lot for your response on this. Your suggestions sound good.
Please see my comments to your mail inline marked with [AA:].
--Alireza
|
By
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
·
#1402
·
|
|
Re: Error handling in market data subscription activation and error notification to application
Hi Alireza,
Thanks for your email.
I think that you have touched upon 2 issues here:
1. Synchronous Fails – if the create fails within the mamaSubscription_initialize() function it
Hi Alireza,
Thanks for your email.
I think that you have touched upon 2 issues here:
1. Synchronous Fails – if the create fails within the mamaSubscription_initialize() function it
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1401
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA RPM Release Scripts
Hi Reed,
Thanks for your feedback, we appreciate your input with this.
The name of the directory was just arbitrarily chosen and we can certainly change it to be something else.
Hi Reed,
Thanks for your feedback, we appreciate your input with this.
The name of the directory was just arbitrarily chosen and we can certainly change it to be something else.
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1400
·
|
|
Error handling in market data subscription activation and error notification to application
Hi Folks,
I have noticed that in Mama C subscription, if a market data subscription activation callback (i.e. createAction) fails the error is not propagated in Mama subscription layer to the
Hi Folks,
I have noticed that in Mama C subscription, if a market data subscription activation callback (i.e. createAction) fails the error is not propagated in Mama subscription layer to the
|
By
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
·
#1399
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous publisher events
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the feedback on the proposed dates.
From the feedback I think the best date that suits most would be Tuesday 16th December @ 4pm UTC, so let's schedule the call for then.
The
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the feedback on the proposed dates.
From the feedback I think the best date that suits most would be Tuesday 16th December @ 4pm UTC, so let's schedule the call for then.
The
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1398
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous publisher events
16th is better for me.
Thanks,
Reed.
Reed Alpert | Corporate & Investment Bank | Market Data Services | J.P. Morgan | 4 Metrotech Center, 23rd Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11245 | T: 718.242.5198 | M:
16th is better for me.
Thanks,
Reed.
Reed Alpert | Corporate & Investment Bank | Market Data Services | J.P. Morgan | 4 Metrotech Center, 23rd Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11245 | T: 718.242.5198 | M:
|
By
Alpert, Reed <reed.alpert@...>
·
#1397
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous publisher events
Either one works for me. Looking forward to the meeting.
--Alireza
Either one works for me. Looking forward to the meeting.
--Alireza
|
By
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
·
#1396
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous publisher events
Hi.
Either is OK by me at the moment
Tom
Hi.
Either is OK by me at the moment
Tom
|
By
Tom Doust
·
#1394
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous publisher events
Hi Guys,
I would like to propose a call this week (or next week) to kick off the discussion for the new mamaPublisher event handling feature.
I was hoping to schedule a call either Thursday 11th, or
Hi Guys,
I would like to propose a call this week (or next week) to kick off the discussion for the new mamaPublisher event handling feature.
I was hoping to schedule a call either Thursday 11th, or
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1395
·
|
|
Re: Asynchronous publisher events
Hi Guys,
I have created an appraisal / proposal document for the new publisher event handling feature on Google Docs which you can find
Hi Guys,
I have created an appraisal / proposal document for the new publisher event handling feature on Google Docs which you can find
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1393
·
|
|
Re: Enforcing field type on publish
Hi Reed,
Thanks for getting back to us.
I think, as you say, the goal will be to have this feature as a plugin and not as an #ifdef, but we would be very interested in seeing your current
Hi Reed,
Thanks for getting back to us.
I think, as you say, the goal will be to have this feature as a plugin and not as an #ifdef, but we would be very interested in seeing your current
|
By
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
·
#1392
·
|