Hi Chad, Thanks for your email. We’ve taken a look at MamaSubscription.java and it does indeed look like there is an issue with the management of the closure when using setupSubscription. The fix seem

Hi Reed, Thanks for getting back to us. I think, as you say, the goal will be to have this feature as a plugin and not as an #ifdef, but we would be very interested in seeing your current implementati

Hi Guys, I have created an appraisal / proposal document for the new publisher event handling feature on Google Docs which you can find here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bxy0Muxit4uc8Bz-y6CS3w

Hi Guys, I would like to propose a call this week (or next week) to kick off the discussion for the new mamaPublisher event handling feature. I was hoping to schedule a call either Thursday 11th, or T

Hi Guys, Thanks for the feedback on the proposed dates. From the feedback I think the best date that suits most would be Tuesday 16th December @ 4pm UTC, so let's schedule the call for then. The conne

Hi Reed, Thanks for your feedback, we appreciate your input with this. The name of the directory was just arbitrarily chosen and we can certainly change it to be something else. Thanks, Gary Gary Moll

Hi Alireza, Thanks for your email. I think that you have touched upon 2 issues here: 1. Synchronous Fails – if the create fails within the mamaSubscription_initialize() function it should be handled a

Hi Guys, I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon. This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc… If there are any issues in particula

Hi Alireza, Yes, it will include the current contents of the next branch. Thanks, Gary Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD g.molloy@...

Hi Guys, I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing. The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora

Hi Guys, It’s looking like a fix for the RPM stuff might take a little while longer, so in the interim I’d like to get started with testing of the RC. If you’re interested and happy to get testing, ei

Hi Reed, Thanks for your email, sorry for the delay in reply. I think you have touched upon 2 items here: 1. When /are there any plans for Enterprise MAMA and OpenMAMA to come into sync? 2. Is it poss

Hi Reed, Currently we have no development activity in the Java code base. Please go ahead and submit your patch(s) Thanks, Gary Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfas

Hi Guys, This reply is a bit later than I anticipated, but I did received some positive feedback from the testing of OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 and so we are ready to make this release final. The issue with t

Hi Guys, We are currently planning the next release of OpenMAMA - OpenMAMA-2.3.3. Please find below the initial list of issues that are currently scheduled for inclusion in this release: BZ166 Make wI

Hi Guys, We have updated some of the tickets being considered for this release asking for some addition information. If you would like to have other issues to be considered for this upcoming release w

BZ-183 Testing:- Not middleware specific. Applies to Windows only. With the patch applied it will be possible to build mama on windows using scons. Here is a very basic config (omama.conf) to test wit

Hi Sam, Thanks for your email. Typical scenarios and use cases that we have encountered, the queue is not usually destroyed that often, so we could very well have missed this during our internally tes

Hi Alireza, Thanks for your patch. I have had a look at it and it looks good. I have logged it in Bugzilla for you as http://bugs.openmama.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187 Thanks, Gary Gary Molloy – SR Labs Ad

Bugzilla Ticket :- Bug 179 Testing Strategy:- Not middleware or O/S specific. This applies to building with QPID only Try building OpenMAMA against the latest version of proton (v0.8) and the build wi