BZ-183 Testing:- Not middleware specific. Applies to Windows only. With the patch applied it will be possible to build mama on windows using scons. Here is a very basic config (omama.conf) to test wit

Hi Guys, We have updated some of the tickets being considered for this release asking for some addition information. If you would like to have other issues to be considered for this upcoming release w

Hi Guys, We are currently planning the next release of OpenMAMA - OpenMAMA-2.3.3. Please find below the initial list of issues that are currently scheduled for inclusion in this release: BZ166 Make wI

Hi Guys, This reply is a bit later than I anticipated, but I did received some positive feedback from the testing of OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 and so we are ready to make this release final. The issue with t

Hi Reed, Currently we have no development activity in the Java code base. Please go ahead and submit your patch(s) Thanks, Gary Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfas

Hi Reed, Thanks for your email, sorry for the delay in reply. I think you have touched upon 2 items here: 1. When /are there any plans for Enterprise MAMA and OpenMAMA to come into sync? 2. Is it poss

Hi Guys, It’s looking like a fix for the RPM stuff might take a little while longer, so in the interim I’d like to get started with testing of the RC. If you’re interested and happy to get testing, ei

Hi Guys, I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing. The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora

Hi Alireza, Yes, it will include the current contents of the next branch. Thanks, Gary Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD g.molloy@...

Hi Guys, I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon. This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc… If there are any issues in particula

Hi Alireza, Thanks for your email. I think that you have touched upon 2 issues here: 1. Synchronous Fails – if the create fails within the mamaSubscription_initialize() function it should be handled a

Hi Reed, Thanks for your feedback, we appreciate your input with this. The name of the directory was just arbitrarily chosen and we can certainly change it to be something else. Thanks, Gary Gary Moll

Hi Guys, Thanks for the feedback on the proposed dates. From the feedback I think the best date that suits most would be Tuesday 16th December @ 4pm UTC, so let's schedule the call for then. The conne

Hi Guys, I would like to propose a call this week (or next week) to kick off the discussion for the new mamaPublisher event handling feature. I was hoping to schedule a call either Thursday 11th, or T

Hi Guys, I have created an appraisal / proposal document for the new publisher event handling feature on Google Docs which you can find here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bxy0Muxit4uc8Bz-y6CS3w

Hi Reed, Thanks for getting back to us. I think, as you say, the goal will be to have this feature as a plugin and not as an #ifdef, but we would be very interested in seeing your current implementati

Hi Chad, Thanks for your email. We’ve taken a look at MamaSubscription.java and it does indeed look like there is an issue with the management of the closure when using setupSubscription. The fix seem