Hi Frank, I won't make it to today's call, but wanted to give some feedback : 1)I think it is perfectly OK to break backwards compatibility given: · We are all aware that the API need some architectur

Hi Frank, You right, I should specify further what we have in mind: -Of course dictionary are not mandatory, and I don't think anyone wants the "dictionary check" to be default behaviour, it has to be

Just to put emphasis on what Reed explain: It should be probably implemented in the C layer, making sure that it "catches" all languages "for free". The goal is to enforce it in OpenMama layer, so tha

Hi everyone, I noticed that when compiling on Linux, flag -std=gnu99 is set, meaning support for C99. However, on windows, VS started supporting C99 from VS2013: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive

Hi Damian, Looked at the diff, wouldn't you do winheaders = Glob('windows/*.h') to be sure to capture any further windows headers ? Cheers, Ben.

Hi list, When comparing the binaries release http://www.openmama.org/sites/default/files/openmama_2.3.1_WIN32-dynamic.zip and what I get through compiling from source, the windows headers file (mman.h

Hi List, Attached is a patch fixing a memleak in mamaMsgImpl_setPayload. impl->payload is not checked for a owned previous payload before the assignment, leading to a memory leak, in particular was sh

Hi List, I've started looking at UnitTests in more details, and hit some question : SetByteBuffer test is using (msgPayload*, mamaPayloadBridge, void**,mama_size_t) which doesn't match the signature d

Hi List, I expected that I can reference nearly everything in a payload bridge : For a Msg containing a subMsg or VectorMsg, it would be invalid to destroy the subMsg or Msg in the Vector BEFORE destr

Hi Glenn, I remember Joshua Salit from IBM requesting 'S' the 4th February 2013 on the list, hence my choice :). My payload bridge is coded according to what you said. Please double check if S is stil

Hi List, Please find attach patch for Payload Bridge enumeration for Solace. Regards, Benjamin Taieb.

Hi Damian, That is very unfortunate indeed. That mean that every single payload will have to implement that, making it even further difficult to migrate back to the right thing. May I suggest we look

Hi list, When doing some test withh cpp iterator, we have a problem with the first field being missed. This can be traced back to the below function in MamaMsg.cpp : MamaMsgField& MamaMsg::begin (Mama

Hello, Would it be possible that the following enumeration values be reserved: MAMA_PAYLOAD_SOLACE = 'C' Upon approval I can submit a patch with the code changes needed to support the new values. Rega

Hi, I'm working for a hardware based MOM vendor (Solace Systems) and we are thinking about developing a mw bridge for openMama. I've some questions : 1)When I look at http://www.openmama.org/what-is-o