OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
|
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
Hi Gary,
Is the current content of ‘next’ branch what you had in mind for the 2.3.2 release?
Regards,
--Alireza
From: openmama-dev-bounces@... [mailto:openmama-dev-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Gary Molloy
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 8:57 AM To: openmama-dev@... Subject: [Openmama-dev] OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
Hi Alireza,
Yes, it will include the current contents of the next branch.
Thanks, Gary
From: Alireza Assadzadeh [mailto:Alireza.Assadzadeh@...]
Sent: 06 January 2015 14:10 To: Gary Molloy; openmama-dev@... Subject: RE: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Gary,
Is the current content of ‘next’ branch what you had in mind for the 2.3.2 release?
Regards,
--Alireza
From:
openmama-dev-bounces@... [mailto:openmama-dev-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora repository has updated the default version of proton, to 0.8, and this doesn’t contain the “proton/util.h” header file anymore. This is causing the mock RPM’s to fail as we look for this include file in a few places. I don’t believe that we actually use any of the functions that were in the util.h header, but I will investigate this further, correct it and get the RPMs out as soon as possible.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Sent: 06 January 2015 13:57 To: openmama-dev@... Subject: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Alireza Assadzadeh <Alireza.Assadzadeh@...>
Gary,
Is it possible to include the fix for the following issues in the 2.3.2? There is a patch available for each of these.
Bug 176 - MAMAC: Missing actions for snapshot subscriptions transition to deactivate state Bug 169 - Wombat queue has no separate deallocate method Bug 166 - Wombat: wInterlocked_set inconsistent return value
Thanks.
--Alireza
From: Gary Molloy [mailto:g.molloy@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 10:02 AM To: Alireza Assadzadeh Cc: openmama-dev@... Subject: RE: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Alireza,
Yes, it will include the current contents of the next branch.
Thanks, Gary
From: Alireza Assadzadeh [mailto:Alireza.Assadzadeh@...]
Hi Gary,
Is the current content of ‘next’ branch what you had in mind for the 2.3.2 release?
Regards,
--Alireza
From:
openmama-dev-bounces@... [mailto:openmama-dev-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
Hi Guys,
It’s looking like a fix for the RPM stuff might take a little while longer, so in the interim I’d like to get started with testing of the RC. If you’re interested and happy to get testing, either building yourself or with a binary release, can you drop me a email.
Depending on the availability of testers, we’ll look at reviewing the status the week of the 26th, and decide then if we’re going to require a second RC.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Sent: 08 January 2015 11:56 To: openmama-dev@... Subject: RE: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora repository has updated the default version of proton, to 0.8, and this doesn’t contain the “proton/util.h” header file anymore. This is causing the mock RPM’s to fail as we look for this include file in a few places. I don’t believe that we actually use any of the functions that were in the util.h header, but I will investigate this further, correct it and get the RPMs out as soon as possible.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Lee Skillen <lskillen@...>
Hi Gary,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Have you tried looking into an alternative tool for building binary distributions? We use FPM with great success internally (humourously entitled F'ing Package Manager, no doubt because packages are a joy to work with). Introduction: http://www.semicomplete.com/blog/geekery/fpm.html GitHub: https://github.com/jordansissel/fpm It's capable of turning gem (ruby), pypi (python), pear (php), directories and tarballs into deb/rpm (and more) packages. Basic usage is to build from source and install into a different prefix that represents the relative install root (e.g. prefix=/tmp/openmama/usr/local). Then you can do something like: fpm -s dir -t rpm -n openmama -v 2.3.2-rc1 -d libuuid-devel --iteration 1 --description "OpenMAMA 2.3.2-rc1" -C /tmp/openmama . Which should generate an rpm such as: openmama-2.3.2_rc1-1.x86_64.rpm There's a ton of other options that might be useful and are worth looking into. Good luck! As for the RC itself - We don't specifically utilise RCs but we do utilise the next branch. If any issues crop up we'll let you know. Cheers, Lee On 14 January 2015 at 16:58, Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...> wrote:
Hi Guys, --
Lee Skillen Vulcan Financial Technologies 1st Floor, 47 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 6RY Office: +44 (0)28 95 817888 Web: www.vulcanft.com |
|
|
|
Alpert, Reed <reed.alpert@...>
Hi,
From a testing perspective we’ve been building/using Next branch for some months and have no problems.
Thanks,
Reed.
Reed Alpert | Corporate & Investment Bank | Market Data Services | J.P. Morgan | 4 Metrotech Center, 23rd Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11245 | T: 718.242.5198 | M: 917.414.4613 | reed.alpert@...
Alternate Contact: CIB PIM Trading Technology Solutions NA | CIB_PIM_Trading_Technology_Solutions_NA@...
From: openmama-dev-bounces@... [mailto:openmama-dev-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Gary Molloy
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 11:59 AM To: openmama-dev@... Subject: Re: [Openmama-dev] OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
It’s looking like a fix for the RPM stuff might take a little while longer, so in the interim I’d like to get started with testing of the RC. If you’re interested and happy to get testing, either building yourself or with a binary release, can you drop me a email.
Depending on the availability of testers, we’ll look at reviewing the status the week of the 26th, and decide then if we’re going to require a second RC.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora repository has updated the default version of proton, to 0.8, and this doesn’t contain the “proton/util.h” header file anymore. This is causing the mock RPM’s to fail as we look for this include file in a few places. I don’t believe that we actually use any of the functions that were in the util.h header, but I will investigate this further, correct it and get the RPMs out as soon as possible.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to European legal entities. |
|
|
|
Gary Molloy <g.molloy@...>
Hi Guys,
This reply is a bit later than I anticipated, but I did received some positive feedback from the testing of OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 and so we are ready to make this release final.
The issue with the RPM’s is still unresolved, but this will be resolved and included in the next release.
Glenn, do we have your permission for sign-off?
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Sent: 14 January 2015 16:59 To: openmama-dev@... Subject: RE: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
It’s looking like a fix for the RPM stuff might take a little while longer, so in the interim I’d like to get started with testing of the RC. If you’re interested and happy to get testing, either building yourself or with a binary release, can you drop me a email.
Depending on the availability of testers, we’ll look at reviewing the status the week of the 26th, and decide then if we’re going to require a second RC.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora repository has updated the default version of proton, to 0.8, and this doesn’t contain the “proton/util.h” header file anymore. This is causing the mock RPM’s to fail as we look for this include file in a few places. I don’t believe that we actually use any of the functions that were in the util.h header, but I will investigate this further, correct it and get the RPMs out as soon as possible.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|
|
Glenn McClements <g.mcclements@...>
Yep, looks good, please proceed.
Glenn
From: Gary Molloy
Date: Monday, 23 February 2015 14:42 To: "openmama-dev@..." Subject: Re: [Openmama-dev] OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 Hi Guys,
This reply is a bit later than I anticipated, but I did received some positive feedback from the testing of OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 and so we are ready to make this release final.
The issue with the RPM’s is still unresolved, but this will be resolved and included in the next release.
Glenn, do we have your permission for sign-off?
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Sent: 14 January 2015 16:59 To: openmama-dev@... Subject: RE: OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1
Hi Guys,
It’s looking like a fix for the RPM stuff might take a little while longer, so in the interim I’d like to get started with testing of the RC. If you’re interested and happy to get testing, either building yourself or with a binary release, can you drop me a email.
Depending on the availability of testers, we’ll look at reviewing the status the week of the 26th, and decide then if we’re going to require a second RC.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I have cut the new OpenMAMA-2.3.2 branch and created the OpenMAMA-2.3.2-rc1 tag, and this is currently available for testing.
The RPM’s will be delayed unfortunately. It seems that the Fedora repository has updated the default version of proton, to 0.8, and this doesn’t contain the “proton/util.h” header file anymore. This is causing the mock RPM’s to fail as we look for this include file in a few places. I don’t believe that we actually use any of the functions that were in the util.h header, but I will investigate this further, correct it and get the RPMs out as soon as possible.
Thanks, Gary
From: Gary Molloy
Hi Guys,
I will be cutting RC1 for the next release, 2.3.2, this afternoon.
This will contain a handful of minor issues, unit tests updates, enterprise issues etc…
If there are any issues in particular you would like to see included in the next release, please feel free to reply and we can review any issue for inclusion.
Thanks, Gary
Gary Molloy – SR Labs Adelaide Exchange | 24-26 Adelaide Street | Belfast | BT2 8GD
|
|
|