|
Re: OpenMAMA doesn't seem to work with WOMBAT tibrv bridge
Slavomir,
At this time the commercial bridges for TIBRV, LBM and NYSE Data Fabric supplied by NYSE as part of the MAMA 4.x and 5.x releases are not compatible with OpenMAMA; however, they will be
Slavomir,
At this time the commercial bridges for TIBRV, LBM and NYSE Data Fabric supplied by NYSE as part of the MAMA 4.x and 5.x releases are not compatible with OpenMAMA; however, they will be
|
By
Mike Schonberg <mschonberg@...>
·
#34
·
|
|
OpenMAMA doesn't seem to work with WOMBAT tibrv bridge
Hi,
I have finally got around to build the OpenMAMA 2.1 on Windows and all worked great. Perhaps just a small thing. In avis project post-build event I had to change the CommandLine to
copy
Hi,
I have finally got around to build the OpenMAMA 2.1 on Windows and all worked great. Perhaps just a small thing. In avis project post-build event I had to change the CommandLine to
copy
|
By
Slavomir Kundrik
·
#33
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA Linux install problem
Hi Glenn,
Sorry about this, I get the following error building from the src tar:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -g -O2 -L/opt/openmama/lib -L./../cpp -L./../cpp/mamda
Hi Glenn,
Sorry about this, I get the following error building from the src tar:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -g -O2 -L/opt/openmama/lib -L./../cpp -L./../cpp/mamda
|
By
Aidan Russell
·
#32
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA Linux install problem
Thanks Glenn, I'll give it a try (I assumed the build download was 32 bit).
regards,
Aidan
Thanks Glenn, I'll give it a try (I assumed the build download was 32 bit).
regards,
Aidan
|
By
Aidan Russell
·
#31
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA Linux install problem
Ahh just realised you're running on i686 (32 bit) whereas the binary is built for x86_64 (64 bit).
If you download the source and build from scratch it will be OK. Source for the 2.1 release is
Ahh just realised you're running on i686 (32 bit) whereas the binary is built for x86_64 (64 bit).
If you download the source and build from scratch it will be OK. Source for the 2.1 release is
|
By
Glenn McClements <gmcclements@...>
·
#30
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA Linux install problem
Hi Glenn,
I get the following:
bash-3.2$ make -f Makefile.sample .mamalistencpp
g++ -I../../..//include -c -o mamalistencpp.o mamalistencpp.cpp
g++ -I../../..//include -rdynamic -L../../..//lib
Hi Glenn,
I get the following:
bash-3.2$ make -f Makefile.sample .mamalistencpp
g++ -I../../..//include -c -o mamalistencpp.o mamalistencpp.cpp
g++ -I../../..//include -rdynamic -L../../..//lib
|
By
Aidan Russell
·
#29
·
|
|
Re: OpenMAMA Linux install problem
Hi Aidan,
What error are you getting when you try to compile? I'm running on a very similar version (below), though it should work on most modern Linux distributions.
2.6.18-194.11.4.el5 #1 SMP Tue
Hi Aidan,
What error are you getting when you try to compile? I'm running on a very similar version (below), though it should work on most modern Linux distributions.
2.6.18-194.11.4.el5 #1 SMP Tue
|
By
Glenn McClements <gmcclements@...>
·
#28
·
|
|
OpenMAMA Linux install problem
Hi,
I downloaded the OpenMAMA 2.1 Linux package, and installed. However the binaries are not compatible with the platform below, so I cannot execute the test programs, or compile a test program (lib
Hi,
I downloaded the OpenMAMA 2.1 Linux package, and installed. However the binaries are not compatible with the platform below, so I cannot execute the test programs, or compile a test program (lib
|
By
Aidan Russell
·
#27
·
|
|
Re: 2.1.1.2 install problem and version compatibility question
Hi Glenn,
Thanks following up. Good news on the wire compatibility - will give me lots more integration options :-)
Re: building. The README file indicates you only need to run generateBuildFiles.sh
Hi Glenn,
Thanks following up. Good news on the wire compatibility - will give me lots more integration options :-)
Re: building. The README file indicates you only need to run generateBuildFiles.sh
|
By
Bill Nokes <bill.nokes@...>
·
#26
·
|
|
Re: 2.1.1.2 install problem and version compatibility question
Hi Bill,
Answers below.
Is OpenMama 2.x wire compatible with 1.x? I'd like to run a Java 2.x subscriber and be able to pick up either 1.x or 2.x messages.
Yes. The wire level protocols are defined
Hi Bill,
Answers below.
Is OpenMama 2.x wire compatible with 1.x? I'd like to run a Java 2.x subscriber and be able to pick up either 1.x or 2.x messages.
Yes. The wire level protocols are defined
|
By
Glenn McClements <gmcclements@...>
·
#25
·
|
|
2.1.1.2 install problem and version compatibility question
Hi,
I've just picked up OpenMama 2.x and I've a few questions if I may (I tried #openmama, but all's quiet there)...
Is OpenMama 2.x wire compatible with 1.x? I'd like to run a Java 2.x subscriber
Hi,
I've just picked up OpenMama 2.x and I've a few questions if I may (I tried #openmama, but all's quiet there)...
Is OpenMama 2.x wire compatible with 1.x? I'd like to run a Java 2.x subscriber
|
By
Bill Nokes <bill.nokes@...>
·
#24
·
|
|
Re: Playing With Custom Bridges / Payloads for OpenMAMA
Hi Frank,
We do have a null bridge implementation which would be prototype for anyone interested to write bridge to the OpenMAMA, Will are also working on the null payload bridge implementation.
The
Hi Frank,
We do have a null bridge implementation which would be prototype for anyone interested to write bridge to the OpenMAMA, Will are also working on the null payload bridge implementation.
The
|
By
Jacobraj Benet <JBenet@...>
·
#22
·
|
|
Playing With Custom Bridges / Payloads for OpenMAMA
Hi Folks,
I can see the Bridge and Payload is nicely separated in the C code, but there is some code in there which I'm not certain is required for just the bridge implementation as opposed to for the
Hi Folks,
I can see the Bridge and Payload is nicely separated in the C code, but there is some code in there which I'm not certain is required for just the bridge implementation as opposed to for the
|
By
Frank Quinn <fquinn.ni@...>
·
#21
·
|
|
Open Data Model Docs available for feedback (OpenMDM)
Hey All,
We are delighted to announce the release of the OpenMDM Phase 2 Equities and Indices Consultation documentation which shall be published over the next week.
In this first documentation
Hey All,
We are delighted to announce the release of the OpenMDM Phase 2 Equities and Indices Consultation documentation which shall be published over the next week.
In this first documentation
|
By
Jamie Hill
·
#23
·
|
|
OpenMAMA-2.1.1.2 and New Branches
I pushed a number of changes to the git repository this week, and created two
new branches.
The new branches are "next" and OpenMama-2.1.1. The next branch contains all the
patches submitted to the
I pushed a number of changes to the git repository this week, and created two
new branches.
The new branches are "next" and OpenMama-2.1.1. The next branch contains all the
patches submitted to the
|
By
Michael Schonberg <mschonberg@...>
·
#20
·
|
|
Re: CTA demo
The wmw middleware should be build in the API and Feedhandler, you should be fine with demo kit.
Jacob
From: John Gray <john.gray@...>
Date: Friday, June 8, 2012 11:26 AM
To: Jacobraj Benet
The wmw middleware should be build in the API and Feedhandler, you should be fine with demo kit.
Jacob
From: John Gray <john.gray@...>
Date: Friday, June 8, 2012 11:26 AM
To: Jacobraj Benet
|
By
Jacobraj Benet <JBenet@...>
·
#19
·
|
|
Re: installation with AVIS
Do you have libstdc++ installed? You can check in the synaptic package manager.
Regards,
-Mike
Do you have libstdc++ installed? You can check in the synaptic package manager.
Regards,
-Mike
|
By
mschonberg <mschonberg@...>
·
#18
·
|
|
Re: kRe: installation with AVIS
Getting there - added a symlink to /usr/lib64 for libuuid.so and that got me further...
However, getting some undefined references:
libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -rdynamic -o .libs/comboticker
Getting there - added a symlink to /usr/lib64 for libuuid.so and that got me further...
However, getting some undefined references:
libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -rdynamic -o .libs/comboticker
|
By
John Gray <john.gray@...>
·
#17
·
|
|
kRe: installation with AVIS
On what OS are you building? Where are you finding libuuid.so?
I build fine with no modifications to LD_LIBRARY_PATH on Fedora 16:
/lib64/libuuid.so.1
/lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0
On what OS are you building? Where are you finding libuuid.so?
I build fine with no modifications to LD_LIBRARY_PATH on Fedora 16:
/lib64/libuuid.so.1
/lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0
|
By
mschonberg <mschonberg@...>
·
#16
·
|
|
Re: installation with AVIS
Apologies for resorting back again - this is probably more UNIX than mama!
I can see the make files being constructed, but the examples are still not being built - and the make seems to stop before
Apologies for resorting back again - this is probably more UNIX than mama!
I can see the make files being constructed, but the examples are still not being built - and the make seems to stop before
|
By
John Gray <john.gray@...>
·
#15
·
|